Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±³Á¤Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹Þ´Â ¾î¸°ÀÌÀÇ ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º¿äÀο¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

CARIES ACTIVITY FACTORS OF CHILDREN IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2002³â 29±Ç 4È£ p.568 ~ 573
À̱¤Èñ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̱¤Èñ ( Lee Kwang-Hee ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

±³Á¤Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹Þ´Â ¾î¸°À̵éÀÇ ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º¿¡ °ü¿©ÇÏ´Â ¿äÀεéÀ» ±Ô¸íÇÏ°íÀÚ, °íÁ¤¼º ¹× °¡Ã¶¼º ±³Á¤ ÀåÄ¡¸¦ ±¸°­¿¡ ÀåÂøÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â ¾î¸°ÀÌ 50¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Cariostat ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º°Ë»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ°í ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î¼­ ¼ºº°, ¿¬·É, ±³Á¤ÀåÄ¡ ÀåÂø±â°£, ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ Á¾·ù, ÀåÄ¡¸¦ ÀåÂøÇÑ ºÎÀ§, Angle¾¾ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ ºÐ·ù, ¿ì½Ä°æÇèÄ¡ ¼ö µîÀÇ ¿äÀÎÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸´ë»óÀÇ Cariostat °Ë»ç¼ºÀûÀº 0Á¡°ú 3Á¡ÀÌ °¢°¢ 1¸í(2£¥)¾¿ ÀÖ¾ú°í 1Á¡ÀÌ 22¸í(44£¥), 2Á¡ÀÌ 26¸í(52£¥)À̾ú´Ù. Àú¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º±ºÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿¬·ÉÀº 9.96¼¼, °í¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º±ºÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿¬·ÉÀº 11.56¼¼·Î¼­ µÎ ±º°£ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ À¯ÀÇÇÏ¿´´Ù(P<0.01). ±¸°­³» ±³Á¤ÀåÄ¡ ÀåÂø±â°£Àº Àú¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º±ºÀÌ 16.13°³¿ù, °í¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º±ºÀÌ 20.48°³¿ù·Î¼­ °í¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º±ºÀÇ ÀåÂø±â°£ÀÌ ±æ¾úÀ¸³ª À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù(P>0.05). °¡Ã¶¼º ÀåÄ¡¸¸ ÀåÂøÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡ ºñÇØ °íÁ¤¼º ÀåÄ¡¸¦ ÀåÂøÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡¼­ ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼ºÀÌ ´õ ³ô¾Ò´Ù(P<0.01). »ó¾Ç¿¡¸¸ ÀåÂøÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡ ºñÇØ »ó¾Ç°ú ÇϾǿ¡ ´Ù ÀåÂøÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡¼­ ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼ºÀÌ ´õ ³ôÀº ºÐÆ÷¸¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀǼºÀº ¾ø¾ú´Ù(P>0.05). Angle¾¾ 1±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡ ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼ºÀÌ ³ô°í ¥²±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡ ¿ì½ÄÈ°¼ºÀÌ ³·Àº ºÐÆ÷¸¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀǼºÀº ¾ø¾ú´Ù(P>0.05). ¿ì½Ä°æÇèÄ¡ ¼ö´Â Àú¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º±ºÀÌ 1.83°³, °í¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º±ºÀÌ 1.41°³À̾úÀ¸³ª À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾Æ´Ï¾ú°í(P>0.05) Àüü Æò±ÕÀº 1.60°³À̾ú´Ù.

The purpose of study was to investigate the caries activity factors of children during orthodontic treatment. Fifty children with fixed or removable intraoral orthodontic appliances were examined for their Cariostat caries activity test scores, gender, age, duration of treatment, appliance type, treatment site, Angle¢¥s classification of malocclusion, and the number of teeth with caries experience. The mean age of the high caries activity group was significantly higher than that of the low caries activity group(P<0.01). The duration of treatment of the high caries activity group was longer than that of the low caries activity group, but the difference was not signifycant(P>0.05). The fixed appliance group showed higher caries activity than the removable appliance group(P(0.01). The caries activity of Angle Class i group was lower than that of Angle Class I group, not significant statistically(P>0.05). The number of teeth with caries experience in the high caries activity group was lower than that in the low caries activity group, not significant statistically(P)0.05).

Å°¿öµå

±³Á¤Ä¡·á;¿ì½ÄÈ°¼º;¾î¸°ÀÌ;Cariostat;Orthodontic treatment;Caries activity;Children;Cariostat

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI